MECANISMOS, ESTRATÉGIAS E CONTEXTO DA TRANSFERÊNCIA DE TECNOLOGIA VERDE E INOVAÇÃO VERDE: REVISÃO DE ESCOPO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n2-116Palavras-chave:
Revisão Sistemática, Indicadores, Modelo Conceitual, Capacidade Absortiva VerdeResumo
O objetivo deste estudo é examinar a transferência de tecnologia verde (TTV) em organizações corporativas e sua relação com a inovação verde, buscando investigar os mecanismos que conectam a TTV à inovação verde, as estratégias corporativas envolvidas e a influência de fatores contextuais. A metodologia adotada consiste em uma revisão sistemática de escopo, baseada no protocolo PRISMA-ScR e nas orientações do Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), com o propósito de mapear e sistematizar as evidências científicas existentes. Os procedimentos metodológicos incluem a aplicação Matriz FOFA para análise estratégica da transferência de tecnologia verde, como análises bibliometricas e cientométricas, com o apoio de softwares de tratamento de dados (Mendeley, R/RStudio, VOSviewer). No período de 2016 a 2024, observou-se um crescimento médio anual da produção científica de 7,87% ao ano (CAGR). Os resultados revelam temas que impulsionam as pesquisas e identificam indicadores de transferência de tecnologia verde organizados em quatro dimensões: difusão, colaboração, valor e contexto, além da proposição de um modelo conceitual. Conclui-se que a existência de um ecossistema de inovação robusto, associado a incentivos às empresas, domínio técnico e financiamento em pesquisa e desenvolvimento (P&D) constitui fator essencial para o fortalecimento da transferência de tecnologia verde.
Downloads
Referências
ADOMAKO, Samuel; TRAN, Mai Dong. Exploring the effect of R&D support, green technology transfer, sustainable innovation. Sustainable Development, v. 32, n. 5, p. 4758-4769, 2024.
BAI, Yu et al. Can environmental innovation benefit from outward foreign direct investment to developed countries? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 27, n. 12, p. 13790-13808, 2020.
BANGA, Rashmi. Trade and Environment: Can International Trading Rules Help?. Development, v. 65, n. 1, p. 10-13, 2022.
BAUM, Matthias; SCHWENS, Christian; KABST, Ruediger. A latent class analysis of small firms’ internationalization patterns. Journal of World Business, v. 50, n. 4, p. 754-768, 2015.
BORTHAKUR, Barasha. Who owns what? The patent landscape of environmentally sound technologies. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, v. 18, n. 8, p. 566-586, 2023.
CHEN, Yanchun; HAN, Botang; LIU, Wenmei. Green technology innovation and energy intensity in China. Natural Hazards, v. 84, n. Suppl 1, p. 317-332, 2016.
COHEN, Wesley M. et al. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990.
CORSI, Alana et al. Technology transfer oriented to sustainable development: proposal of a theoretical model based on barriers and opportunities. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 6, p. 5081-5112, 2021.
DU, Kerui; LI, Jianglong. Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy, v. 131, p. 240-250, 2019.
DUAN, Dezhong; JIN, Hong. Environmental regulation and green technology diffusion: A case study of Yangtze River Delta, China. Land, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1923, 2022.
ESCOBAR DOMINGUEZ, Alina; MORENO CRUZ, Marta Milagros. Propiedad intelectual y transferencia de tecnologías ecológicamente racionales: apuntes sobre el preámbulo, los objetivos y principios del acuerdo sobre los ADPIC. Revista chilena de derecho y ciencia política, v. 14, 2023.
FERNANDES, Cristina I. et al. Green growth versus economic growth: do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice?.Business strategy and the environment, v. 30, n. 4, p. 2021-2037, 2021.
HE, Yugang. Promoting Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Systems and Environmental Taxes. Applied Sciences, v. 14, n. 16, p. 7404, 2024.
HEDGER, M. M. et al. Enabling environments for technology transfer. In: Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer. A special report of IPCC Working Group III. Cambridge University Press, 2000. p. 105-141.
HÖTTE, Kerstin. How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity. Energy Economics, v. 85, p. 104565, 2020.
JIANG, Ying; XU, Jin; WANG, Guofei. Trade in green patents: How do green technologies flow in China?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 49, n. 3, p. 823-856, 2024.
KIRCHHERR, Julian; URBAN, Frauke. Technology transfer and cooperation for low carbon energy technology: Analysing 30 years of scholarship and proposing a research agenda. Energy policy, v. 119, p. 600-609, 2018.
LI, Yaya et al. Structural characteristics and determinants of an international green technological collaboration network. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 324, p. 129258, 2021.
LIAO, Zhongju et al. Does the patent value of green technology affect its transfer? The moderating role of industry competition. Environmental Research, v. 241, p. 117620, 2024.
LOSACKER, Sebastian. ‘License to green’: Regional patent licensing networks and green technology diffusion in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 175, p. 121336, 2022.
MA, Jing; WU, Lihua; HU, Jingxuan. Dynamic evolution and driving mechanism of a multi-agent green technology cooperation innovation network: Empirical evidence based on exponential random graph model. Systems, v. 13, n. 8, p. 706, 2025.
MOORE, Keith M.; THIONGANE, Soukeye. Rural Senegalese perceptions of environmental quality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 25, n. 3, p. 307-317, 2000.
MORSINK, Karlijn; HOFMAN, Peter S.; LOVETT, Jon C. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for transfer of environmentally soundtechnologies. Energy Policy, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2011.
MUNN, Zachary et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 143, 2018.
NGUYEN, Hieu Thanh et al. Green technology transfer in a developing country: Mainstream practitioner views. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, p. 699-720, 2022.
POLLOCK, Danielle et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, v. 21, n. 3, p. 520-532, 2023.
RAMANATHAN, R. Successful transfer of environmentally sound technologies for greenhouse gas mitigation: a framework for matching the needs of developing countries. Ecological Economics, v. 42, n. 1-2, p. 117-129, 2002.
SANTOS SILVA, Luan Carlos et al. Tool for assessment of the green technology transfer structure in Brazilian public universities. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 8, p. 6873, 2023.
SHANG, Yongmin; LYU, Guoqing; MI, Zefeng. Green technology transfer, environmental regulation, and regional green development chasm: Based on the empirical evidence from Yangtze River Delta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 19, n. 21, p. 13925, 2022.
SHI, Xiaoyi; SUI, Feixue; HUANG, Xiaoxia. Green technology transfer for firms in a multi-layer network perspective: The dual impact of knowledge resources and regional environment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, v. 39, p. 104291, 2025.
TERÁN-BUSTAMANTE, Antonia; MARTÍNEZ-VELASCO, Antonieta; LÓPEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Andrée Marie. University–industry collaboration: a sustainable technology transfer model. Administrative Sciences, v. 11, n. 4, p. 142, 2021.
WU, Aiping; LI, Hua. The impact of government subsidies on contract design of green technology R&D cooperation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 34, n. 11, p. 1263-1279, 2022.
XING, Guangyuan; DONG, Hao. Outward foreign direct investment and industrial structure upgrading: The mediating role of reverse green technology innovation, the moderating role of R&D investment and environmental regulation. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 11, p. 9062, 2023.
XU, Guannan et al. How do competition and collaboration promote green technology diffusion? Evidence from the global hydropower industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 478, p. 143890, 2024.
YAN, Zheming et al. Convergence or divergence? Understanding the global development trend of low-carbon technologies. Energy Policy, v. 109, p. 499-509, 2017.
YANG, Xiaohui; JIA, Zhen; YANG, Zhongmin. Spatial impact mechanism of Chinese technology diffusion on CO2 emissions in the countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 30, n. 8, p. 21368-21383, 2023.
YUAN, Wenhua; LU, Weixiao; ZHANG, Junyan. The impact of depth of environmental provisions and CO2 emissions embodied in international trade. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 30, n. 49, p. 108301-108318, 2023.
ZHANG, Lupeng; XUE, Lan; ZHOU, Yuan. How do low-carbon policies promote green diffusion among alliance-based firms in China? An evolutionary-game model of complex networks. Journal of cleaner production, v. 210, p. 518-529, 2019.
ZHANG, Zhenyu; REN, Xumin. Multidimensional legal research on the transfer of environmentally sound technologies in China. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 3, p. 2151, 2023.
ZHAO, Hong-xiao et al. Spatial evolution of green technology cooperation among three major urban agglomerations in China and its carbon emission reduction effect. Journal of Natural Resources, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1341-1357, 2024.
ZHAO, Linhai; RASOULINEZHAD, Ehsan. Role of natural resources utilization efficiency in achieving green economic recovery: evidence from BRICS countries. Resources Policy, v. 80, p. 103164, 2023.
