MECANISMOS, ESTRATEGIAS Y CONTEXTO DE LA TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGÍA VERDE E INNOVACIÓN VERDE: UNA REVISIÓN DE ALCANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n2-116Palabras clave:
Revisión Sistemática, Indicadores, Modelo Conceptual, Capacidad Absortiva VerdeResumen
El objetivo de este estudio es examinar la Transferencia de Tecnología Verde (TTV) en organizaciones corporativas y su relación con la innovación verde, buscando investigar los mecanismos que conectan la TTV con la innovación verde, las estrategias corporativas involucradas y la influencia de factores contextuales. La metodología adoptada consiste en una revisión sistemática de alcance, basada en el protocolo PRISMA-ScR y en las directrices del Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), con el propósito de mapear y sistematizar la evidencia científica existente. Los procedimientos metodológicos incluyen la aplicación de la Matriz FODA para el análisis estratégico de la transferencia de tecnología verde, así como análisis bibliométricos y cienciométricos, con el apoyo de software de procesamiento de datos (Mendeley, R/RStudio, VOSviewer). En el período de 2016 a 2024, se observó un crecimiento promedio anual de la producción científica del 7.87% anual (CAGR). Los resultados revelan temas que impulsan las investigaciones e identifican indicadores de transferencia de tecnología verde organizados en cuatro dimensiones: difusión, colaboración, valor y contexto, además de la proposición de un modelo conceptual. Se concluye que la existencia de un ecosistema de innovación robusto, asociado a incentivos a las empresas, dominio técnico y financiación en investigación y desarrollo (I+D), constituye un factor esencial para el fortalecimiento de la transferencia de tecnología verde.
Descargas
Referencias
ADOMAKO, Samuel; TRAN, Mai Dong. Exploring the effect of R&D support, green technology transfer, sustainable innovation. Sustainable Development, v. 32, n. 5, p. 4758-4769, 2024.
BAI, Yu et al. Can environmental innovation benefit from outward foreign direct investment to developed countries? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 27, n. 12, p. 13790-13808, 2020.
BANGA, Rashmi. Trade and Environment: Can International Trading Rules Help?. Development, v. 65, n. 1, p. 10-13, 2022.
BAUM, Matthias; SCHWENS, Christian; KABST, Ruediger. A latent class analysis of small firms’ internationalization patterns. Journal of World Business, v. 50, n. 4, p. 754-768, 2015.
BORTHAKUR, Barasha. Who owns what? The patent landscape of environmentally sound technologies. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, v. 18, n. 8, p. 566-586, 2023.
CHEN, Yanchun; HAN, Botang; LIU, Wenmei. Green technology innovation and energy intensity in China. Natural Hazards, v. 84, n. Suppl 1, p. 317-332, 2016.
COHEN, Wesley M. et al. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128-152, 1990.
CORSI, Alana et al. Technology transfer oriented to sustainable development: proposal of a theoretical model based on barriers and opportunities. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 6, p. 5081-5112, 2021.
DU, Kerui; LI, Jianglong. Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy, v. 131, p. 240-250, 2019.
DUAN, Dezhong; JIN, Hong. Environmental regulation and green technology diffusion: A case study of Yangtze River Delta, China. Land, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1923, 2022.
ESCOBAR DOMINGUEZ, Alina; MORENO CRUZ, Marta Milagros. Propiedad intelectual y transferencia de tecnologías ecológicamente racionales: apuntes sobre el preámbulo, los objetivos y principios del acuerdo sobre los ADPIC. Revista chilena de derecho y ciencia política, v. 14, 2023.
FERNANDES, Cristina I. et al. Green growth versus economic growth: do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice?.Business strategy and the environment, v. 30, n. 4, p. 2021-2037, 2021.
HE, Yugang. Promoting Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Systems and Environmental Taxes. Applied Sciences, v. 14, n. 16, p. 7404, 2024.
HEDGER, M. M. et al. Enabling environments for technology transfer. In: Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer. A special report of IPCC Working Group III. Cambridge University Press, 2000. p. 105-141.
HÖTTE, Kerstin. How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity. Energy Economics, v. 85, p. 104565, 2020.
JIANG, Ying; XU, Jin; WANG, Guofei. Trade in green patents: How do green technologies flow in China?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 49, n. 3, p. 823-856, 2024.
KIRCHHERR, Julian; URBAN, Frauke. Technology transfer and cooperation for low carbon energy technology: Analysing 30 years of scholarship and proposing a research agenda. Energy policy, v. 119, p. 600-609, 2018.
LI, Yaya et al. Structural characteristics and determinants of an international green technological collaboration network. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 324, p. 129258, 2021.
LIAO, Zhongju et al. Does the patent value of green technology affect its transfer? The moderating role of industry competition. Environmental Research, v. 241, p. 117620, 2024.
LOSACKER, Sebastian. ‘License to green’: Regional patent licensing networks and green technology diffusion in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 175, p. 121336, 2022.
MA, Jing; WU, Lihua; HU, Jingxuan. Dynamic evolution and driving mechanism of a multi-agent green technology cooperation innovation network: Empirical evidence based on exponential random graph model. Systems, v. 13, n. 8, p. 706, 2025.
MOORE, Keith M.; THIONGANE, Soukeye. Rural Senegalese perceptions of environmental quality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 25, n. 3, p. 307-317, 2000.
MORSINK, Karlijn; HOFMAN, Peter S.; LOVETT, Jon C. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for transfer of environmentally soundtechnologies. Energy Policy, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2011.
MUNN, Zachary et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 143, 2018.
NGUYEN, Hieu Thanh et al. Green technology transfer in a developing country: Mainstream practitioner views. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, v. 30, n. 3, p. 699-720, 2022.
POLLOCK, Danielle et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, v. 21, n. 3, p. 520-532, 2023.
RAMANATHAN, R. Successful transfer of environmentally sound technologies for greenhouse gas mitigation: a framework for matching the needs of developing countries. Ecological Economics, v. 42, n. 1-2, p. 117-129, 2002.
SANTOS SILVA, Luan Carlos et al. Tool for assessment of the green technology transfer structure in Brazilian public universities. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 8, p. 6873, 2023.
SHANG, Yongmin; LYU, Guoqing; MI, Zefeng. Green technology transfer, environmental regulation, and regional green development chasm: Based on the empirical evidence from Yangtze River Delta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 19, n. 21, p. 13925, 2022.
SHI, Xiaoyi; SUI, Feixue; HUANG, Xiaoxia. Green technology transfer for firms in a multi-layer network perspective: The dual impact of knowledge resources and regional environment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, v. 39, p. 104291, 2025.
TERÁN-BUSTAMANTE, Antonia; MARTÍNEZ-VELASCO, Antonieta; LÓPEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Andrée Marie. University–industry collaboration: a sustainable technology transfer model. Administrative Sciences, v. 11, n. 4, p. 142, 2021.
WU, Aiping; LI, Hua. The impact of government subsidies on contract design of green technology R&D cooperation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 34, n. 11, p. 1263-1279, 2022.
XING, Guangyuan; DONG, Hao. Outward foreign direct investment and industrial structure upgrading: The mediating role of reverse green technology innovation, the moderating role of R&D investment and environmental regulation. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 11, p. 9062, 2023.
XU, Guannan et al. How do competition and collaboration promote green technology diffusion? Evidence from the global hydropower industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 478, p. 143890, 2024.
YAN, Zheming et al. Convergence or divergence? Understanding the global development trend of low-carbon technologies. Energy Policy, v. 109, p. 499-509, 2017.
YANG, Xiaohui; JIA, Zhen; YANG, Zhongmin. Spatial impact mechanism of Chinese technology diffusion on CO2 emissions in the countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 30, n. 8, p. 21368-21383, 2023.
YUAN, Wenhua; LU, Weixiao; ZHANG, Junyan. The impact of depth of environmental provisions and CO2 emissions embodied in international trade. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 30, n. 49, p. 108301-108318, 2023.
ZHANG, Lupeng; XUE, Lan; ZHOU, Yuan. How do low-carbon policies promote green diffusion among alliance-based firms in China? An evolutionary-game model of complex networks. Journal of cleaner production, v. 210, p. 518-529, 2019.
ZHANG, Zhenyu; REN, Xumin. Multidimensional legal research on the transfer of environmentally sound technologies in China. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 3, p. 2151, 2023.
ZHAO, Hong-xiao et al. Spatial evolution of green technology cooperation among three major urban agglomerations in China and its carbon emission reduction effect. Journal of Natural Resources, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1341-1357, 2024.
ZHAO, Linhai; RASOULINEZHAD, Ehsan. Role of natural resources utilization efficiency in achieving green economic recovery: evidence from BRICS countries. Resources Policy, v. 80, p. 103164, 2023.
