CARGA TRIBUTARIA Y COMPLEJIDAD ECONÓMICA: UN ANÁLISIS DE LOS PAÍSES DEL G20

Autores/as

  • Hugo Leonardo Menezes de Carvalho
  • Mônica Aparecida Ferreira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n1-174

Palabras clave:

Carga Fiscal, Complejidad Económica, G20

Resumen

Este estudio analizó la relación entre la carga tributaria y la complejidad económica en los países del G20, buscando llenar un vacío en la investigación que no ha probado directamente esta asociación. Si bien estudios previos vinculan la carga tributaria con el ingreso per cápita y la complejidad económica con la desigualdad y el ingreso, la interacción entre los dos primeros factores aún no se ha investigado. Se empleó una metodología cuantitativa, estimando un modelo de datos de panel utilizando datos sobre carga tributaria, complejidad económica, ingreso per cápita, innovación y desigualdad de 2012 a 2021 para los países del G20. Los resultados indicaron que la complejidad económica y el ingreso per cápita presentaron una relación positiva y estadísticamente significativa con la carga tributaria, corroborando hallazgos previos, pero con la particularidad de utilizar datos agregados a nivel nacional y centrándose en las economías globales más relevantes. Las hipótesis relativas a la innovación y la desigualdad del ingreso no se confirmaron. Esta investigación contribuye a la literatura al validar la relación entre la carga tributaria y la complejidad económica, incorporando variables nacionales y variables proxy no analizadas conjuntamente en trabajos previos. Los hallazgos pueden respaldar las políticas públicas para el desarrollo económico, especialmente aquellas orientadas a la diversificación a través de la industrialización, que también inciden en los aspectos tributarios. Además, el estudio amplía la investigación empírica sobre los supuestos de la teoría de la complejidad económica, ampliando su aplicabilidad a otros contextos. Por lo tanto, destaca no solo por confirmar las relaciones teóricas, sino también por su enfoque metodológico, que prioriza las economías centrales en el escenario global, ofreciendo perspectivas para los debates sobre tributación y estrategias de crecimiento estructural.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

ADAM, A.; KAMMAS, P.; LAPATINAS, A. Income inequality and the tax structure: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, v. 43, n. 1, p. 138-154, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.006

ALMEIDA, E. R. F. de; ARAUJO, V. de C. Teoria da complexidade econômica e desigualdade de renda: Evidências para a Região do Grande ABC (2000-2010). Gestão; Regionalidade, v. 36, n. 108, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol36n108.5717

ATROSTIC, B. K.; NUNNS, J. R. Measuring tax burden: A historical perspective. In: BERNDT, E. R.; TRIPLETT, J. E. (Ed.). Fifty years of economic measurement: The jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. p. 343-420. Disponível em: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5981/c5981.pdf

BAER, W.; GALVÃO JR., A. F. Tax burden, government expenditures and income distribution in Brazil. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v. 48, n. 2, p. 345-358, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.012

CARVALHO, H. L. M.; ÁVILA, L. A. C. Tax governance: A study of its effects on tax evasion. Brazilian Business Review, v. 19, n. 4, p. 454–474, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.19.4.6

CELIKAY, F. Dimensions of tax burden: A review on OECD countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, v. 25, n. 49, p. 27-44, 2020. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jefas-12-2018-0138

CLEMENTE, F. Analysis of the Brazilian tax incentives to innovation and patent data: a Principal-Agent model approach. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica, v. 13, n. 2, p. 403-437, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v13.n2.2021.6

DELGADO, F. J.; FERNÁNDEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, E.; MARTÍNEZ-ARIAS, A. Size and other determinants of corporate effective tax rates in US listed companies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, n. 98, p. 160-165, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.internationalresearchjournaloffinanceandeconomics.com/ISSUES/IRJFE_98_15.pdf

DIVINO, J. A.; MACIEL, D. T. G. N.; SOSA, W. Government size, composition of public spending and economic growth in Brazil. Economic Modelling, v. 91, p. 155-166, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.001

FERNÁNDEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, E.; MARTÍNEZ-ARIAS, A. Determinants of the effective tax rate in the BRIC countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, v. 50, Sup3, p. 214-228, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X5003S313

FERNÁNDEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, E.; GARCÍA-FERNANDEZ, R.; MARTÍNEZ-ARIAS, A. Business and institutional determinants of effective tax rate in emerging economies. Economic Modelling, v. 94, p. 692-702, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.011

FERRAZ, D. et al. Economic complexity and human development: Comparing standard and slack-based data envelopment analysis models. Revista CEPAL, n. 137, 2022. Disponível em: https://hdl.handle.net/11362/48580

GALA, O. Complexidade econômica: uma nova perspectiva para entender a antiga questão da riqueza das nações. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2017.

GÓMEZ-GONZÁLEZ, J. E.; URIBE, J. M.; VALENCIA, O. M. Does economic complexity reduce the probability of a fiscal crisis? Working Paper. Barcelona: Institut de Recerca en Economia Aplicada Regional i Pública, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.ub.edu/irea/working_papers/2022/202218.pdf

GUJARATI, D. N. Econometria básica. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier-Campus, 2006.

GUJARATI, D. N.; PORTER, D. C. Econometria básica. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2011.

HARTMANN, D. Economic complexity and human development: How economic diversification and social networks affect human agency and welfare. Londres: Routledge, 2014.

HARTMANN, D. et al. Linking economic complexity, institutions and income inequality. World Development, v. 93, p. 75-93, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020

HAUSMANN, R. et al. The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001

HIDALGO, C. A.; HAUSMANN, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), v. 106, n. 26, p. 10570-10575, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106

HILL, C.; GRIFFITHS, E.; JUDGE, G. Econometria. 3. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006.

IOSIFIDI, M.; MYLONIDIS, N. Relative effective taxation and income inequality: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, v. 27, n. 1, p. 57-76, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716672182

JACOB, M. Uma nota sobre a pesquisa tributária. Revista Contabilidade; Finanças, v. 29, n. 78, p. 339-342, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201890280

KUTNER, M. H.; NACHTSCHEIM, C.; NETER, J. Applied linear regression models. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.

LAPATINAS, A.; KYRIAKOU, A.; GARAS, A. Taxation and economic sophistication: Evidence from OECD countries. PLoS ONE, v. 14, n. 3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213498

LAPATINAS, A.; LITINA, A. Intelligence and economic sophistication. Empirical Economics, v. 57, p. 1731–1750, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1511-y

MONDJELI, M. N.; NOMO-BEYALA, B. C. Does Economic Complexity matter for the Mobilisation of Tax Revenues? Preprint. Research Square, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2440422/v1

PHAM, M. H.; TRUONG, H. D. H.; HOANG, D. P. Economic complexity, shadow economy, and income inequality: Fresh evidence from panel data. International Economic Journal, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2024.2311704

QI, Y.; PENG, W.; XIONG, N. N. The effects of fiscal and tax incentives on regional innovation capability: Text extraction based on python. Mathematics, v. 8, n. 7, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071193

RAMOS, L. et al. A Governança econômica global e os desafios do G-20 pós-crise financeira: análise das posições de Estados Unidos, China, Alemanha e Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 55, p. 10-27, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000200002

RIEDEL, N. Quantifying international tax avoidance: A review of the academic literature. Review of Economics, v. 69, n. 2, p. 169-181, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2018-0004

RIVERA, B. et al. Analysis of the effect of human capital, institutionality and globalization on economic complexity: Comparison between Latin America and countries with greater economic diversification. Economies, v. 11, n. 8, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11080204

SHERAZ, M. et al. Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 28, p. 35126–35144, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13116-0

STOJKOSKI, V.; KOCAREV, L. The relationship between growth and economic complexity: Evidence from Southeastern and Central Europe. MPRA Paper, n. 77837, 2017. Disponível em: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77837/3/MPRA_paper_77837.pdf

TEIXEIRA, R. A.; PINTO, E. C. A economia política dos governos FHC, Lula e Dilma: Dominância financeira, bloco no poder e desenvolvimento econômico. Economia e Sociedade, v. 21, n. 4, p. 909–941, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-06182012000400009

WINNER, H. Has tax competition emerged in OECD countries? Evidence from panel data. International Tax and Public Finance, v. 12, p. 667–687, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-2915-0

Publicado

2026-02-04

Cómo citar

de Carvalho, H. L. M., & Ferreira, M. A. (2026). CARGA TRIBUTARIA Y COMPLEJIDAD ECONÓMICA: UN ANÁLISIS DE LOS PAÍSES DEL G20. Revista De Geopolítica, 17(1), e1451. https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n1-174