EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND PHARMACOLOGICAL PROTOCOLS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK

Authors

  • Fernando Malachias de Andrade Bergamo
  • Vitória Pereira de Menezes
  • Saul Marca Quito
  • Alícya Freitas Alves
  • Emanuelle Alice de Campos Gonzaga
  • Lucas Coutinho Vermehren
  • Luis Felipe Silveira Mega
  • Ryan Torquato Botão
  • Dieter Schumacher
  • Luiz Pimentel Pereira Júnior
  • Thais Faes Morgade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-077

Keywords:

Anaphylaxis, Anaphylactic Shock, Adrenaline, Medical Emergency, Therapeutics

Abstract

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is a serious and potentially fatal medical emergency characterized by rapid compromise of the airway, breathing, and/or circulation. This study aimed to review and synthesize recent scientific evidence on emergency management and pharmacological protocols in the treatment of anaphylactic shock. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted in the PubMed and JACI: In Practice databases, using the descriptors "Anaphylaxis" and "Therapeutics," focusing on articles published in the last five years. Results: Intramuscular (IM) adrenaline in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh is confirmed as the absolute mainstay of first-line treatment, and its immediate administration is indispensable upon clinical suspicion. Antihistamines and corticosteroids have a secondary role, restricted to the management of cutaneous symptoms (urticaria/angioedema), and should under no circumstances delay the administration of adrenaline. For cases of refractory anaphylaxis (persistence of symptoms after two IM doses of adrenaline), protocols require advanced support, including continuous intravenous infusion of adrenaline, aggressive volume replacement with crystalloids, and, specifically for patients using beta-blockers, the administration of glucagon. The literature highlights that diagnostic hesitancy and fear of underutilizing adrenaline are critical factors contributing to severe outcomes. Conclusion: Early identification of anaphylaxis, overcoming therapeutic hesitancy, and immediate administration of adrenaline are crucial to optimize patient survival, emphasizing the need for continuous standardization of care protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BEN-SHOSHAN, M. et al. Idiopathic Anaphylaxis. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2025.

DRIBIN, T. E. et al. Anaphylaxis: A contemporary review of terminology, epidemiology, and clinical management. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, v. 156, n. 2, p. 406-417, 2025.

DRIBIN, T. E. et al. Who Needs Epinephrine? Anaphylaxis, Autoinjectors, and Parachutes. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, v. 11, n. 4, p. 1036-1046, 2023.

DRIBIN, T. E.; MOTOSUE, M. S.; CAMPBELL, R. L. Overview of Allergy and Anaphylaxis. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2022.

POUESSEL, G. et al. Management of Refractory Anaphylaxis: An Overview of Current Guidelines. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, v. 54, n. 7, p. 470-488, 2024.

WHYTE, A. F. et al. Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis: concise clinical guidance. Clinical Medicine, v. 22, n. 4, p. 332-339, 2022.

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

Bergamo, F. M. de A., de Menezes, V. P., Quito, S. M., Alves, A. F., Gonzaga, E. A. de C., Vermehren, L. C., Mega, L. F. S., Botão, R. T., Schumacher, D., Pereira Júnior, L. P., & Morgade, T. F. (2026). EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND PHARMACOLOGICAL PROTOCOLS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK. Revista De Geopolítica, 17(5), e2421. https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-077