TUTORING MODELS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE SKILLS IN THE CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY 5.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-090Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Tutoring Models, Knowledge Skills, Industry 5.0, Generative AIAbstract
The expansion of generative artificial intelligence has increased the presence of digital tutoring systems in educational and corporate environments, enhancing the capacity for personalization, scalability, and availability of learning support. At the same time, Industry 5.0 repositions human beings at the center of technological transformation, reinforcing the relevance of knowledge skills for continuous learning, adaptability, and value creation. This article analyzes how artificial intelligence tutoring models relate to the development of knowledge skills in the context of Industry 5.0. The study adopts a theoretical conceptual approach, developed through an integrative literature review based on the authors’ doctoral qualification texts and the project’s authorized sources. The findings indicate that human, artificial, and hybrid tutoring models produce distinct effects on autonomy, motivation, engagement, self-regulated learning, and the development of cognitive, digital, and adaptive competencies. It concludes that AI-based tutoring can serve as a support infrastructure for the development of knowledge skills, provided it operates within a human-centered logic, articulated with pedagogical principles, human curation, knowledge-creation, and circulation processes.
Downloads
References
Acikgul, K., & Sad, S. N. (2026). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model in the educational research. Educational Research Review, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100780
Al-Abri, A. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT as a virtual tutor: A multi-dimensional analysis of large language models in academic support. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13484-x
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Alfirević, N., Hell, M., & Rendulić, D. (2025). Pedagogical qualities of artificial intelligence-assisted teaching: An exploratory analysis of a personal tutor in a voluntary business higher-education course. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158764
Anshari, M., & Hamdan, M. (2022). Understanding knowledge management and upskilling in Fourth Industrial Revolution: Transformational shift and SECI model. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2021-0203
Baillifard, A., Gabella, M., Lavenex, P. B., & Martarelli, C. S. (2025). Effective learning with a personal AI tutor: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12888-5
Cerchione, R., Centobelli, P., Borin, E., Usai, A., & Oropallo, E. (2024). The WISED knowledge-creating company: Rethinking SECI model in light of the digital transition. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(10), 2997–3022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2024-0133
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(4), 2401–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Milković, M. (2025). Trust in generative AI tools: A comparative study of higher education students, teachers, and researchers. Information (Switzerland), 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070622
Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1
European Commission. (2025, October 5). Industry 5.0 - Research and Innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M. F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.003
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
He, G. (2025). Predicting learner autonomy through AI-supported self-regulated learning: A social cognitive theory approach. Learning and Motivation, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102195
Hobert, S., & Berens, F. (2024). Developing a digital tutor as an intermediary between students, teaching assistants, and lecturers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10293-2
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lee, Y. (2025). Developing a computer-based tutor utilizing generative artificial intelligence (GAI) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 7841–7862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13129-5
Leon, R. D. (2023). Employees’ reskilling and upskilling for industry 5.0: Selecting the best professional development programmes. Technology in Society, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102393
Li, Y., Wu, J., Xue, J., & Zhang, X. (2024). Peer or tutor? The congruity effects of service robot role and service type on usage intention. Acta Psychologica, 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104429
Liu, C. (2024). The application of AI and product innovation efficiency: The role of knowledge innovation under SECI model. Aslib Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2024-0348
Liu, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Design principles for supporting self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102319
Massuga, F., Soares, S., & Doliveira, S. L. D. (2021). The tutor’s role in teaching distance education: A systematic review on the competencies approach. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21(66). Universidad de Murcia. https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.435871
Ngo, T. T. A., Vo, T. T. A., & Phan, M. T. (2025). The psychology of AI adoption in education: University students’ intentions to use large language models for learning from a TAM and TPB perspective. Acta Psychologica, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105789
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
Peel, K. L., McLennan, B., Danaher, P. A., & Burnett, E. (2023). Occupational (in)visibility: The emerging role of the remote education tutor as an educational conduit. Australian Educational Researcher, 50(5), 1599–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00576-7
Puderbach, L., Laun, M., & Wolff, F. (2025). Impact of telepresence robots on students’ basic psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation in higher education. Psychology Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257251407697
Reicher, H., Frenkel, Y., Lavi, M. J., Nasser, R., Ran-milo, Y., Sheinin, R., Shtaif, M., & Milo, T. (2025). A generative AI-empowered digital tutor for higher education courses. Information (Switzerland), 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040264
Rikala, P., Braun, G., Järvinen, M., Stahre, J., & Hämäläinen, R. (2024). Understanding and measuring skill gaps in Industry 4.0 — A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123206
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
Sheikh, R. A., Ahmed, I., Faqihi, A. Y. A., & Shehawy, Y. M. (2025). Global perspectives on navigating Industry 5.0 knowledge: Achieving resilience, sustainability, and human-centric innovation in manufacturing. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(5), 15997–16032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01427-2
Shen, Y., Le, H., Wang, Z., & Wang, Q. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of value-sensitive AI in education: A case study of AI tutor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105253
Tbaishat, D., AlFandi, O., Hamad, F., Bukhari, S. M. S., & Al Muhaissen, S. (2026). Modeling generative AI adoption in higher education: An integrated TAM–TPB–SDT framework with SEM validation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100541
Tharapos, M., Lau, K. H., Peszynski, K., Nguyen, L. A., Magdziarz, S., Morton, E., Borg, V., & Duan, S. (2025). Generative AI in accounting education: Evaluating ChatGPT’s role in assessment and skill development. Accounting and Finance, 65(3), 3231–3244. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70051
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
Yin, Z., Karakaya, E., Bass, K., & Cai, H. (2026). Arthur: An artificial intelligence powered teaching assistant system for Engineering Economics class. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 36(1–2), 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijaied.2026.100003
