MODELOS DE TUTORIA EM INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E HABILIDADES DE CONHECIMENTOS NO CONTEXTO DA INDÚSTRIA 5.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-090Palavras-chave:
Inteligência Artificial (IA), Modelos de Tutoria, Habilidades de Conhecimentos, Indústria 5.0, IA GenerativaResumo
A expansão da inteligência artificial generativa ampliou a presença de sistemas de tutoria digital em ambientes educacionais e corporativos, elevando a capacidade de personalização, a escalabilidade e a disponibilidade do suporte à aprendizagem. Em paralelo, a Indústria 5.0 reposiciona o ser humano no centro da transformação tecnológica, reforçando a relevância das habilidades de conhecimento para a aprendizagem contínua, a adaptabilidade e a criação de valor. Este artigo analisa como modelos de tutoria em inteligência artificial se relacionam ao desenvolvimento de habilidades de conhecimento no contexto da Indústria 5.0. O estudo adota uma abordagem teórico-conceitual, desenvolvida por meio de revisão integrativa da literatura, com base nas produções de qualificação dos autores e nas fontes autorizadas do projeto. Os achados indicam que modelos de tutoria humana, artificial e híbrida produzem efeitos distintos sobre a autonomia, a motivação, o engajamento, a aprendizagem autorregulada e o desenvolvimento de competências cognitivas, digitais e adaptativas. Conclui-se que a tutoria baseada em IA pode atuar como infraestrutura de apoio ao desenvolvimento de habilidades de conhecimento, desde que operada com lógica human-centered, articulada a princípios pedagógicos, à curadoria humana e a processos de criação e de circulação do conhecimento.
Downloads
Referências
Acikgul, K., & Sad, S. N. (2026). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model in the educational research. Educational Research Review, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100780
Al-Abri, A. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT as a virtual tutor: A multi-dimensional analysis of large language models in academic support. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13484-x
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Alfirević, N., Hell, M., & Rendulić, D. (2025). Pedagogical qualities of artificial intelligence-assisted teaching: An exploratory analysis of a personal tutor in a voluntary business higher-education course. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158764
Anshari, M., & Hamdan, M. (2022). Understanding knowledge management and upskilling in Fourth Industrial Revolution: Transformational shift and SECI model. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2021-0203
Baillifard, A., Gabella, M., Lavenex, P. B., & Martarelli, C. S. (2025). Effective learning with a personal AI tutor: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12888-5
Cerchione, R., Centobelli, P., Borin, E., Usai, A., & Oropallo, E. (2024). The WISED knowledge-creating company: Rethinking SECI model in light of the digital transition. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(10), 2997–3022. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2024-0133
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(4), 2401–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Milković, M. (2025). Trust in generative AI tools: A comparative study of higher education students, teachers, and researchers. Information (Switzerland), 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070622
Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1
European Commission. (2025, October 5). Industry 5.0 - Research and Innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M. F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.003
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
He, G. (2025). Predicting learner autonomy through AI-supported self-regulated learning: A social cognitive theory approach. Learning and Motivation, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102195
Hobert, S., & Berens, F. (2024). Developing a digital tutor as an intermediary between students, teaching assistants, and lecturers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10293-2
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lee, Y. (2025). Developing a computer-based tutor utilizing generative artificial intelligence (GAI) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 7841–7862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13129-5
Leon, R. D. (2023). Employees’ reskilling and upskilling for industry 5.0: Selecting the best professional development programmes. Technology in Society, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102393
Li, Y., Wu, J., Xue, J., & Zhang, X. (2024). Peer or tutor? The congruity effects of service robot role and service type on usage intention. Acta Psychologica, 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104429
Liu, C. (2024). The application of AI and product innovation efficiency: The role of knowledge innovation under SECI model. Aslib Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2024-0348
Liu, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Design principles for supporting self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102319
Massuga, F., Soares, S., & Doliveira, S. L. D. (2021). The tutor’s role in teaching distance education: A systematic review on the competencies approach. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21(66). Universidad de Murcia. https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.435871
Ngo, T. T. A., Vo, T. T. A., & Phan, M. T. (2025). The psychology of AI adoption in education: University students’ intentions to use large language models for learning from a TAM and TPB perspective. Acta Psychologica, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105789
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
Peel, K. L., McLennan, B., Danaher, P. A., & Burnett, E. (2023). Occupational (in)visibility: The emerging role of the remote education tutor as an educational conduit. Australian Educational Researcher, 50(5), 1599–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00576-7
Puderbach, L., Laun, M., & Wolff, F. (2025). Impact of telepresence robots on students’ basic psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation in higher education. Psychology Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257251407697
Reicher, H., Frenkel, Y., Lavi, M. J., Nasser, R., Ran-milo, Y., Sheinin, R., Shtaif, M., & Milo, T. (2025). A generative AI-empowered digital tutor for higher education courses. Information (Switzerland), 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040264
Rikala, P., Braun, G., Järvinen, M., Stahre, J., & Hämäläinen, R. (2024). Understanding and measuring skill gaps in Industry 4.0 — A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123206
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
Sheikh, R. A., Ahmed, I., Faqihi, A. Y. A., & Shehawy, Y. M. (2025). Global perspectives on navigating Industry 5.0 knowledge: Achieving resilience, sustainability, and human-centric innovation in manufacturing. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(5), 15997–16032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01427-2
Shen, Y., Le, H., Wang, Z., & Wang, Q. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of value-sensitive AI in education: A case study of AI tutor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105253
Tbaishat, D., AlFandi, O., Hamad, F., Bukhari, S. M. S., & Al Muhaissen, S. (2026). Modeling generative AI adoption in higher education: An integrated TAM–TPB–SDT framework with SEM validation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100541
Tharapos, M., Lau, K. H., Peszynski, K., Nguyen, L. A., Magdziarz, S., Morton, E., Borg, V., & Duan, S. (2025). Generative AI in accounting education: Evaluating ChatGPT’s role in assessment and skill development. Accounting and Finance, 65(3), 3231–3244. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70051
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
Yin, Z., Karakaya, E., Bass, K., & Cai, H. (2026). Arthur: An artificial intelligence powered teaching assistant system for Engineering Economics class. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 36(1–2), 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijaied.2026.100003
