BEYOND THE BLACK BOX WARNING: THE RISK OF SUICIDAL IDEATION FROM SSRIS AND THE DANGERS OF COGNITIVE POLYPHARMACY IN CHILDHOOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-105Keywords:
Psychopharmacology, Pediatrics, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Psychostimulants, Nootropics, Suicidal Ideation, MedicalizationAbstract
Introduction: Child and adolescent psychiatry faces an unprecedented epidemiological crisis in the post-pandemic period, characterized by a substantial increase in diagnoses of internalizing disorders (depression and anxiety) and cognitive deficit complaints. Objective: To synthesize and critically analyze current evidence on the efficacy and safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), emphasizing the risk of suicidal ideation, and to investigate the phenomenon of excessive use of psychostimulants and nootropics in polypharmacy regimens. Method: Integrative literature review guided by Evidence-Based Medicine, encompassing randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines published in the last decade in PubMed, PsycINFO, and SciELO databases. Results: SSRIs (notably fluoxetine and sertraline) demonstrate superior efficacy to placebo but require strict surveillance due to the FDA's black box warning for initial suicidal ideation. Simultaneously, there is a growing and often irrational prescription of psychostimulants and nootropics for academic performance optimization, lacking robust evidence for this purpose. Discussion: Infant metabolism alters the pharmacokinetics of these substances, requiring precise dosage adjustments. Polypharmacy combining SSRIs and stimulants elevates cardiovascular and psychiatric risks. Ethically, the pathologization of post-pandemic psychosocial suffering and the urgency of preserving the minor's assent are discussed. Conclusion: It is imperative to prioritize evidence-based psychotherapies as first-line treatments, institute rigorous monitoring protocols in the first weeks of SSRI use, and restrict the use of stimulants to validated clinical diagnoses of ADHD.
Downloads
References
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY (AACAP). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Major and Persistent Depressive Disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 62, n. 5, p. 479-502, 2023.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 6023: Informação e documentação - Referências - Elaboração. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2018..
BRIDGE, J. A. et al. Clinical response and risk for reported suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in pediatric antidepressant treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA, v. 297, n. 15, p. 1683-1696, 2007.
CIPRIANI, A. et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis. The Lancet, v. 388, n. 10047, p. 881-890, 2016.
CORTESE, S. et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, v. 5, n. 9, p. 727-738, 2018.
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA). Revisions to Product Labeling: Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs. Silver Spring, MD: FDA, 2004. Atualizado periodicamente. Disponível em documentos de farmacovigilância oficiais.
MARCH, J. et al. Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial. JAMA, v. 292, n. 7, p. 807-820, 2004.
VITIELLO, B. et al. Polypharmacy in child and adolescent psychiatry. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, v. 21, n. 4, p. 869-883, 2012.
ZITO, J. M. et al. Psychotropic practice patterns for youth: a 10-year perspective. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, v. 157, n. 1, p. 17-25, 2003.