THE ILLUSION OF MODERNIZATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAZILIAN TAX REFORM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXTRACTIVE INSTITUTIONS

Authors

  • Flávio Maluf de Carvalho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-149

Keywords:

Tax Reform, Extractive Institutions, Simplification, Regressivity, Economic Freedom

Abstract

This article analyzes the reforms in consumption and income taxation in Brazil, investigating whether they effectively address the structural problems of the tax matrix: complexity, regressivity, and lack of federative autonomy. The objective is to evaluate whether the simplification proposed by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023 is sufficient to promote economic development or if it merely consolidates the power of extractive institutions. The methodology consists of bibliographic and documentary research, with a legal-political approach based on the institutionalist theory of Acemoglu and Robinson. The results indicate that, although the reform aligns Brazil with the Value Added Tax (VAT) model of Comparative Law, it fails by not reducing the tax burden and by maintaining distortions that protect the state bureaucracy to the detriment of economic freedom and progressivity. It is concluded that the reform simplifies tax collection for the State, but does not correct institutions aimed at self-protection, keeping the system functional for bureaucratic elites and inefficient for society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.

Brasil. (2023). Emenda Constitucional nº 132, de 20 de dezembro de 2023. Altera o Sistema Tributário Nacional. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União.

Brasil. (2025, 19 de setembro). Viva o SUS: O maior sistema público de saúde do mundo é gratuito, universal e do Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2025/setembro/viva-o-sus-o-maior-sistema-publico-de-saude-do-mundo-e-gratuito-universal-e-do-brasil

Buchholz, K. (2024, 12 de janeiro). The U.S. states losing & gaining population [Infográfico]. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/katharinabuchholz/2024/01/12/the-us-states-losing--gaining-population-infographic/

Government Accountability Office. (2013). Federal User Fees: A design guide. U.S. Government Printing Office. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-13-820

Murphy, L., & Nagel, T. (2002). The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice. Oxford University Press.

OCDE. (2022). Revenue Statistics 2022: Tax revenue buoyancy in OECD countries. OECD Publishing.

Pacheco, R. (2024). Competitividade Tributária na América Latina: O caso do Paraguai e a migração de capitais brasileiros. Editora Jurídica Nacional.

Receita Federal do Brasil. (2025). Relatório de Saídas Definitivas do País: Evolução do fluxo migratório fiscal. Ministério da Fazenda.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). The crisis of the tax state. International Economic Papers.

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

de Carvalho, F. M. (2026). THE ILLUSION OF MODERNIZATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAZILIAN TAX REFORM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXTRACTIVE INSTITUTIONS. Revista De Geopolítica, 17(5), e2517 . https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n5-149