ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE: CHALLENGES TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW AND THE FORMATION OF ECOLOGICAL SUBJECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n4-189Keywords:
Critical Pedagogy, Intergenerational Responsibility, Socio-Environmental JusticeAbstract
The intensification of climate change has consolidated the environmental crisis as one of the major contemporary challenges, requiring integrated responses that articulate legal, educational, and political dimensions. In this context, this article aims to analyze the legal and formative implications of Environmental Education in addressing the climate crisis, with an emphasis on its relationship with climate governance and the principle of intergenerational responsibility. This study adopts a qualitative approach, with an exploratory and analytical-interpretative nature, developed through bibliographic and documentary procedures. National and international legal frameworks were analyzed, as well as theoretical contributions from the fields of critical Environmental Education and Environmental Law. Content analysis was employed as the analytical technique, enabling the organization of data into thematic categories. The findings reveal that, although there is a robust legal framework recognizing the right to an ecologically balanced environment and the importance of education, there remains a significant gap between normative provisions and their effective implementation in educational practices and public policies. Furthermore, Environmental Education, when grounded in a critical and interdisciplinary perspective, demonstrates the potential to mediate the relationship between legal norms and social practices, contributing to the formation of ecological subjects and the strengthening of environmental citizenship. It is concluded that the effectiveness of Environmental Law in the context of climate change depends on the consolidation of a critical Environmental Education, articulated with climate governance and guided by principles of socio-environmental justice and intergenerational responsibility. Finally, the study highlights the need to strengthen integrated public policies and to expand formative practices committed to social transformation.
Downloads
References
Acselrad, H. (2009). Environmental justice and the social construction of risk. Relume Dumará.
Brazil. (1988). Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. Federal Senate. Retrieved April 14, 2026, from http://www.planalto.gov.br
Brazil. (1999). Law No. 9,795, of April 27, 1999: Establishes the National Environmental Education Policy. Presidency of the Republic. Retrieved April 14, 2026, from http://www.planalto.gov.br
Brazil. (2009). Law No. 12,187, of December 29, 2009: Establishes the National Policy on Climate Change. Presidency of the Republic. Retrieved April 14, 2026, from http://www.planalto.gov.br
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of autonomy: Knowledge necessary for educational practice. Paz e Terra.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
Layrargues, P. P. (2014). Environmental education: Rethinking the space of citizenship (5th ed.). Cortez.
Leite, J. R. M. (2015). Brazilian environmental law (12th ed.). Saraiva.
Loureiro, C. F. B. (2012). Environmental education and social movements in the construction of ecological citizenship. Cortez.
Morin, E. (2000). The seven complex lessons in education for the future. Cortez; UNESCO.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved April 14, 2026, from https://unfccc.int
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). Paris Agreement. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210583190
Weiss, E. B. (1992). In fairness to future generations: International law, common patrimony, and intergenerational equity. United Nations University.