WHEN BIOMIMICRY BECOMES A BUZZWORD: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF ITS MISUSE IN RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY

Abstract

Objective: To critically assess the concept of biomimicry in restorative dentistry and identify instances of its misuse or overgeneralization in contemporary literature and clinical practice.

Methodology: A narrative review was conducted using major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Articles discussing biomimetic principles, restorative materials, and clinical techniques were evaluated. Emphasis was placed on identifying discrepancies between true biomimetic approaches and marketing-driven or conceptually inaccurate applications.

Results: Biomimicry has been widely adopted in restorative dentistry, often associated with adhesive techniques and minimally invasive approaches. However, the review identified a frequent misuse of the term, with many materials and techniques labeled as “biomimetic” without adequately replicating the structural, mechanical, or functional properties of natural dental tissues. This conceptual dilution may lead to confusion among clinicians and misinterpretation of scientific evidence. Furthermore, a lack of standardized definitions contributes to inconsistent application in both research and clinical contexts.

Conclusion: Although biomimicry remains a valuable guiding principle in restorative dentistry, its misuse as a buzzword undermines scientific rigor and clinical clarity. Clear definitions and evidence-based criteria are needed to ensure its appropriate application. Future research should aim to align material development and clinical protocols with true biomimetic principles.